Tuesday, September 2, 2008

No choice for Bristol could means no choice for all

i find it very interesting that Sarah Palin is McCain's pick. if she can't get her children to follow her lead how does she expect the nations to follow. Her daughter's pregnancy raises many questions. Palin notes that that Bristol has 'chosen' on her own to keep the baby. she did not chose, with her mother running for VP there was no choice her her, and if McCain/Palin win there will be no choice for America's women. Furthermore, Palin states that she will not support 'explicit sex-ed programs' in Alaska (Jazebel article) so how can we expect her to support them nation wide. i am sorry but the old stand by of absinenst-only education does not work. Bristol is case in point. maybe if this girl had the knowledge of, and access to contraceptives she would not be were she is. yes, yes her and the boyfriend (ET article) plan to marry. again like they have a choice. there is no way that the Republican party would allow any unwed mother to be the VP's daughter. i feel for this girl, she has no choice and should her mother win we all may caught in that same situation. much will be learned about Sarah Palin, a woman who doesn't seem to know here she stands on a lot of things that are important to this nation, from how she proceeds with her daughter and the 'choices' her daughter makes.

No comments: